Toni Neacșu critică motivarea CCR pe amendamentul Fritz

The Constitutional Court of Romania published a 65-page document explaining its decision on the 'Fritz amendment' in the new Integrity Law. The majority argues that the law does not retroactively impose sanctions but addresses the effects of past violations on current mandates. Lawyer Toni Neacșu criticized the reasoning as unconvincing and clumsy, suggesting it allows for new causes for termination of mandates. The court distinguishes between completed legal situations and ongoing effects of previous violations, asserting that a definitive finding of incompatibility continues to impact the integrity of a position until the three-year prohibition ends.