Noi critici ale CSM privind legea salarizării: Președintele instanței supreme ar avea un salariu mai mic decât al unui consilier prezidențial

The Superior Council of Magistracy criticizes the public salary law project, claiming it undermines judicial authority and places judges' salaries below those of other state officials. They highlight that the president of the High Court earns less than a presidential advisor, raising concerns about the constitutional positioning of the judiciary. The CSM argues that the proposed salary structure creates significant disparities, affecting judges' independence and status. They emphasize that adequate salaries for magistrates are essential for maintaining judicial independence and threaten to use all legal means to protect judges' constitutional status.