Mădălin Hodor (CNSAS), replică pentru Nicușor Dan: Crimele Revoluției și Mineriadei pot fi investigate după „modelul german”

Mădălin Hodor suggests applying the German model for addressing past crimes, emphasizing that time does not erase individual responsibility. He cites examples of Nazi war criminals prosecuted later in life to support his argument. Hodor criticizes the skepticism expressed by President Nicușor Dan regarding the resolution of the Revolution and Mineriadei cases, questioning the notion of a statute of limitations on truth. He highlights changes in legal standards since 2011 that allow for prosecution based on complicity in crimes. Meanwhile, Dan defends Lucian Pahonțu, the head of SPP, against allegations of involvement in repressive actions during the Revolution and Mineriadei.