„Eroarea factuală” a lui Nicușor Dan criticată deschis de un cunoscut politolog, în cazul lui Călin Georgescu. Ce „spectacol regizat de Parchet” denunță

Cristian Pîrvulescu criticizes Nicușor Dan for a factual error regarding Călin Georgescu's legal situation. He emphasizes that the court's decision does not imply guilt and highlights the problematic public spectacle surrounding Georgescu's arrest. Pîrvulescu argues that Dan should have refrained from commenting on the case, as it could mislead public perception. He also points out that the handling of the case reflects broader issues of trust in institutions. The portrayal of Georgescu as a victim of political persecution complicates the public's understanding of justice. Pîrvulescu warns that the spectacle of the arrest may reinforce false narratives about judicial independence and could diminish public confidence in the legal system.