Două dispoziții din din Legea vânătorii și a protecției fondului cinegetic, declarate neconstituționale de CCR

The Constitutional Court ruled that certain provisions of the Hunting and Game Protection Law are unconstitutional, particularly those limiting moral damages based on salary. This decision emphasizes the need for fair compensation for victims of wild animal attacks, allowing judges to assess damages based on individual circumstances. The court found that the existing law's criteria for calculating damages were inadequate and discriminatory, failing to consider various income sources. As a result, victims can now seek compensation under general civil law provisions. The ruling is final and binding.