Decizia CEDO în cazul asistentei care a provocat tragedia de la Maternitatea Giulești, folosită drept exemplu în apărarea lui Călin Georgescu

Călin Georgescu's defense cited a CEDO ruling regarding a former nurse's case to argue against his preventive detention. They claimed that preventive arrest should not serve public satisfaction or revenge. Georgescu did not provide a full statement on the accusations but made a brief general comment. His lawyers emphasized the lack of evidence for flight risk, noting his compliance with legal proceedings. They argued that house arrest would suffice instead of preventive detention, referencing a CEDO decision that criticized preventive measures lacking objective justification. The defense highlighted that previous cases showed the necessity for clear reasoning behind such detentions, which should not be punitive in nature.