Danileț: CCR trebuie să explice întreruperea unui mandat în curs. Critici în cazul Fritz • Newsweek România

Cristi Danileț argues that the Constitutional Court must clarify the interruption of an ongoing mandate, criticizing its recent decision affecting Dominic Fritz. He cites previous jurisprudence that prohibits such interruptions, suggesting the Court's reasoning may be legally indefensible. Danileț highlights a 2005 ruling that established that ongoing mandates cannot be interrupted by new laws. He expresses concern over the quality of the Court's motivations, implying they may be manipulated to justify the decision. The Court recently upheld an amendment to the Integrity Law, which could lead to the loss of mandates for officials in conflict of interest situations, including Fritz.