Dacă „Domnul Pahonțu nu este în această situație”, așa cum a spus Nicușor Dan, de ce șeful SPP nu și-a depus, de 18 ani, declarația că nu a făcut poliție politică?

The article discusses the controversy surrounding Lucian Pahonțu's position as head of the SPP, highlighting concerns about his lack of a declaration regarding political police involvement. Nicușor Dan's support for Pahonțu raises questions about accountability and the criteria for leadership in security services. The piece reflects on the implications of past abuses during the Romanian Revolution and the importance of public trust in state institutions. It critiques the notion that not being criminally convicted is sufficient for holding such a significant role, emphasizing the need for transparency and adherence to legal obligations.