Cum argumentează judecătorii decizia de arestare preventivă a lui Călin Georgescu. Motivarea Curții de Apel București

The Bucharest Court of Appeal justified the preventive arrest of Călin Georgescu by citing risks of evasion and influencing the investigation. Evidence indicated discussions about fleeing the country and seeking asylum in Italy. The court deemed Georgescu a social danger due to serious allegations from DIICOT, which included fraud and deception in a business deal that led to a loss of 1.1 million euros for a businessman. The decision was not unanimous, as one judge disagreed, citing insufficient evidence for organized crime. The case originated from a complaint by Răzvan Leu, who was misled into a fraudulent investment scheme involving a loan guarantee.