adevarul.ro/adevarul-juridic/de-ce-a-respins-judec

The Aiud Court rejected requests for expert analysis of 89 CDs in an arson case, citing insufficient evidence of discrepancies. The defense argued inconsistencies between recordings and the indictment, but the court found no serious indications of evidence tampering. Additionally, a request for an expert to verify missing WhatsApp messages was dismissed as it did not meet legal criteria. The court deemed that enhancing surveillance footage clarity was unnecessary given existing evidence.