„Amendamentul Fritz”, între mit și realitate: unde se termină propaganda și unde începe problema juridică

The Constitutional Court's decision on the new integrity law has sparked accusations from USR and supporters of Dominic Fritz, claiming it retroactively targets him. The court ruled that contested transitional provisions do not violate the principle of non-retroactivity. The case centers on Fritz's established conflict of interest, raising questions about the legal consequences for his current mandate. Previous laws already outlined sanctions for conflicts of interest, complicating claims that new sanctions were created specifically for Fritz. The new law alters the timing of when sanctions apply, linking them more directly to the finalization of integrity issues, rather than allowing a mandate to continue until its end.